Explainer: what Islam actually says about domestic violence
Marriage is the legally or formally recognized intimate and complementing union of two people While marriage is honored throughout the Bible and affirmed among Christians, there is no suggestion that it is necessary Instead, the wife and husband share a fully equal partnership in both their marriage and in the family. It goes without saying that the marriage of a Muslim woman to a non-Muslim man is while a Muslim man is allowed to get married to a non Muslim woman, .. to a religion in which a Book was revealed as the Torah or Bible. Islam's position on domestic violence is drawn from the Qur'an, prophetic practice , The Qur'an says the relationship is based on tranquillity, about a husband's responsibility toward his wife than his response when asked.
We talk about peace, justice, compassion, generosity and God — referencing religions far beyond our own, across time, distance, and culture. Despite all this, some people still ask us, exasperated: It makes sense that so many of us dream, initially at least, that we will find true love with a person who shares the same religious label, because we think it means they have walked the same religious path that we have.About Husband & Wife in Bible - Biblelum Christhavamum - Ep 10 - IBC Tamil TV
We naturally look for someone who has made the same leaps of faith, who has gone through the same internal transformation, who nods along knowingly as we describe our indescribable connection to something invisible.
We imagine someone who gets us, who shares the same truth or God or gods that we do, or, perhaps, who has uttered the same denials as us, or who remains as steadfastly unsure about the meaning of it all as we ourselves are. The assumption here is that sharing the same religion is a shortcut to deeper unity. But praying the same words in the same order, or reading the same sacred book through and through again, or singing the same songs are not necessarily a gateway to a meaningful connection.
Each journey of faith is unique and personal. No two believers are alike. And, as anyone in any relationship will tell you, no two people are alike. Everyone has their own views, opinions and convictions, regardless of their chosen religion or lack of one.
Some relationships are interfaith, but all relationships are inter-belief. What is that necessary and sufficient factor?
We have found that it is far more important to share the same values than the same religion. It is true that some values are associated more closely with certain religion affiliations. But values do not just take root inside a person as a result of their religion, of how they have chosen to describe or name or worship God. We choose our values because of myriad factors: Our values shape us, as our journeys through life — and our journeys through faith — play out.
In faith, as in love, we leap. We whisper holy words, words that hold power, maybe magic. They consider the husband-father to be 'sovereign' over his household—the family leader, provider, and protector. They call for a wife to be obedient to her head, her husband.
Christian views on marriage
Family authority and responsibilities[ edit ] Orthodox betrothal depicted by Vasily Vladimirovich Pukirev Much of the dispute hinges on how one interprets the New Testament Household Code Haustafel which has as its main focus hierarchical relationships between three pairs of social classes that were controlled by Roman law: The Roman law of Manus gave the husband nearly absolute autocratic power over his wife, including life and death.
The law of Patria Potestas Latin for "Rule of the Fathers" gave a husband equally severe power over his children and slaves. Theologian Frank Stagg : Crouch concludes that the early Christians found in Hellenistic Judaism a code which they adapted and Christianized. The Staggs believe the several occurrences of the New Testament Household Code in the Bible were intended to meet the needs for order within the churches and in the society of the day.
The Staggs write that there is some suggestion in scripture that because Paul had taught that they had newly found freedom "in Christ", wives, children, and slaves were taking improper advantage of the Haustafel both in the home and the church. At bottom is probably to be seen the perennial tension between freedom and order What mattered to Paul was 'a new creation' [Gal. Two of these Christianized codes are found in Ephesians 5: The importance of the meaning of "head" as used by the Apostle Paul is pivotal in the conflict between the Complementarian position and the Egalitarian view.
She found that its second most frequent use in the New Testament was to convey the metaphorical sense of "source".
What happens when you fall in love across the religious divide?
They interpret that verse to mean that God the father is the authoritative head over the Sonand in turn Jesus is the authoritative head over the church, not simply its source. By extension, they then conclude that in marriage and in the church, the man is the authoritative head over the woman. The context seems to imply an authority structure based on a man sacrificing himself for his wife, as Christ did for the church; a love-based authority structure, where submission is not required but freely given based on the care given to the wife.
The historical grammatical method is a hermeneutic technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words, but also the syntactical aspects, the cultural and historical background, and the literary genre. Thus references to a patriarchal Biblical culture may or may not be relevant to other societies.
What is believed to be a timeless truth to one person or denomination may be considered a cultural norm or minor opinion to another. They emphasize that nowhere in the New Testament is there a requirement for a wife to obey her husband.
The phrase "mutual submission" comes from a verse in Ephesians 5: It reads, "Submit to one another 'mutual submission' out of reverence for Christ", wives to husbands, children to parents, and slaves to their master.
Christian Egalitarians believe that full partnership in marriage is the most biblical view, producing the most intimate, wholesome, and reciprocally fulfilling marriages.
It does not imply that women and men are identical or undifferentiated, but affirms that God designed men and women to complement and benefit one another.
Therefore, they see that "oneness" as pointing to gender equality in marriage. They believe the biblical model for Christian marriages is therefore for the spouses to share equal responsibility within the family—not one over the other nor one under the other.
David Dykes, theologian, author, and pastor of a 15,member Baptist church, sermonized that "When you are in Christ, you have full equality with all other believers". The Bible verse reads: Acknowledging the differences between men and women, Dykes writes that "in Christ, these differences don't define who we are. The only category that really matters in the world is whether you are in Christ.
At the cross, Jesus destroyed all the made-made[ clarification needed ] barriers of hostility: The first section consists of versesverse 21 is the connection between the two, and the second section consists of verses The wife submits to her husband in everything "as unto the Lord. Instruction about submission is four times longer for husbands than for wives.
Christian views on marriage - Wikipedia
The greatest burden of submission is clearly placed on the husband. The word translated "help" or "helper" in Genesis 2: The first distortion was extrabiblical: Thus, wives were often referred to as her husband's "helpmate".
It is now realized that of the 21 times the Hebrew word 'ezer is used in the Old Testament, in eight of those instances the term clearly means "savior"—another word for Jehovah God. For example, Psalm My help 'ezer comes from the Lord, the Maker of heaven and earth.
The Apostle Paul also quoted the Genesis 2: All three synoptic gospels record virtually the same teaching of Jesus, adding to its apparent significance: There is no priority of one spouse over the other.
In truth, they are one. They conclude that the Apostle Paul's statement, sometimes called the "Magna Carta of Humanity"  and recorded in Galatians 3: Their order of appearance alternates, with Aquila mentioned first in the first, third and fifth mentions, and Priscilla Prisca first in the other three.
Such decisions should be made rationally and wisely, [Eph 5: Examples of a couple's decision logic might include: